On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 03:27:20PM -0600, Monique Y. Mudama wrote: ... > Perhaps that should be > > s/If women are so weak they can't/If women have better things to do > than/
very likely... > > But I don't really know, just having noticed this subthread right > abotu now, and not sufficiently motivated to go back and find the > origin. Did a lot of women who used to post here recently stop doing > so? not that I'm aware of. This thread was just a typical OT ramble that stemmed from something else. > > I really have no business in this discussion, since I just a couple of > days ago thought, "Hrm, I should resubscribe to debian-user and see > what's up." Back in the day, I can't remember anyone doing anything > particularly offensive to women on this list. Certainly nothing on > par with the slashdot and thedailywtf noise. I think the most offensive thing to women on this list would be exclamations about how easier it is to understand package foo than our <insert female of personal significance here>. Although admittedly, there haven't been as many women in the mix lately as say a few months ago. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
