On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:32:55AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Watch out that data=journal. It is far more kernel-bug prone than > data=ordered, for the simple fact that almost everyone uses data=ordered, > including those who mess with the ext3 code, so bugs can hide in the > data=journal code paths a lot more easily. >
If data=journal is subject to kernel bugs then you are saying that Linux doensn't have any filesystem suitable for non-UPS-protected systems. If the devs don't properly audit the data=journal code then they shouldn't provide it as an option in a production kernel. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
