-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/22/08 02:13, Mark Allums wrote: [snip] > > You could conceivably have both samba and NFS support at the same time. > Samba may be a bit better for a small network with Windows machines. > There exists a lot of support for it, and configuration is pretty > painless in my experience. NFS is workable.
Not only that, but the samba people are working to make good enough to be the preferred Unix network fs. samba.org should have howtos, and there are books and web pages aplenty, - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhd/OUACgkQS9HxQb37XmdQ8QCdGPnokan0n37lS+P4dY2HUC96 9q4AnRnnKLsAYdkSkqwlE9lnmKTGmoKx =UGi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
