On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:44:52 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/14/08 21:20, Chris Burkhardt wrote: > > Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > >> In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his > >> acrobat reader performs a lot faster. > > > > Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise? > > > > (sorry for not answering your actual question) > > And you know that Windows Acroread is (should be) highly tuned. > > - -- > Ron Johnson, Jr. > Jefferson LA USA > > "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New > York is doomed." > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkh8DyQACgkQS9HxQb37Xmej8wCfS4NTUuLK52MCAzQU000Yz6ny > 3WcAoId/SGl4qme9DTByerjKnt92/z0o > =f/wc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Yes, you are right it is probably tuned. So far xpdf is great, I mean the pdfs launch a lot faster and it generally is better in performance except for the large file described According to pdfinfo: Page size: 2588.16 x 1578.84 pts File size: 3619630 bytes Thanks, Amit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]