On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:22:48PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:09:14 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:23:48PM -0400, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > I think I solved the problem. The files were missing, but also found. > > > > > > This is what I found: > > > > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_spe/plugins/kiki -> > > > /usr/share/pycentral/spe/site-packages/_spe/plugins/kiki -> > > > ../../../../kiki/site-packages/kiki > > > > > > However, there was no ../../../../kiki/site-packages/kiki. However, I > > > did find the following: > > > > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/kiki/ > > > > > > so I setup > > > /usr/share/pycentral/spe/site-packages/_spe/plugins/kiki -> > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/kiki/ > > > > > > (replaced the sym link to ../../../../kiki/site-packages/kiki with > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/kiki/) > > > > > > The same was true for wxGlade, although it is called wxglade in > > > python2.5. > > > > > > After making those two sym links, dpkg --configure -a completed without > > > any errors. > > > > that sounds like it might be a packaging bug. BUt I would think others > > would be reporting it as well. If you see anyone else ask about this, > > then I'd say it warrants a bug report. > > I suspect that the problem may have been caused by using python 2.3 to > perform the setup of python 2.5. Even Etch has python 2.4 as the default > version already. Mark, do you know why your system defaulted to python > 2.3? Has it been a really long time (years) since the previous upgrade?
he's been, so far as I can tell, using apt-get upgrade. Mightn't that cause him to stay on 2.3? A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
