Jeff Soules wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Mike McCarty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Must... not... compare... emacs... to... Operating... System...
I wasn't comparing anything to anything. I don't understand
even what your objection might be.
In the old vi-vs.-EMACS flamewars it was often claimed by vi advocates
that EMACS' larger memory footprint and greater attempted
extensibility made it basically a replacement operating system. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war .
Oh, I'm aware of that. I just didn't get it. Ok, he was
talking to HIMSELF not to compare EMACS to an OS. That's
why the ellipsis. I thought he was simulating a slow system.
Ok.
I'll admit that I don't care for EMACS, myself. However, I also
don't care for VI. The main advantage of VI is, it's always
present on any *NIX type system, so knowing how to use it
is an advantage.
Anwyway, thanks for the response.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
