On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:18:31 +1100 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:12:08PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote: > > Can someone please explain why the BLEEP support was removed? > > It was probably removed because the BLEEP is mostlikely non-BLEEP and > as such would violate the BLEEP. But that's just a BLEEP.
That was what I thought, a pain in the BLEEP. :-) > -- > "Police noticed some rustling sounds from Linn's bottom area > and on closer inspection a roll of cash was found protruding > from Linn's anus, the full amount of cash taken in the robbery." > - > http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/robber-hides-loot-up-his-booty/2008/05/09/1210131248617.html > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]