On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:04:19PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 01/30/2009 09:54 PM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 02:52:34AM +0000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >>On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:54:34AM +0000, Dean Chester wrote:
> >>If a 100% CPU usage causes your computer to *over*heat (which is > >>something you did not write above) you'll have a problem elsewhere (e.g. > >>a dist-upgrade that includes tex-live :-) ) > > > >Or, is the board firmware slowing down the CPU to allow it to cool, > >which makes a basically idling debian system to use a higher percentage > >of available CPU (less idle time). Remember, its a percentage of CPU > >capacity. If the CPU slows down, the the available capacity decreases. > > But "100% CPU usage" isn't the same as "running at 100% of rated > clock speed". > > Is *that* what you are really referring to? To illustrate what I mean, lets change from percentage to some ficticuous numbers. Lets say that the CPU when cool can make 100 BIGMACS per second. When the CPU is cool, top shows that it is 99% idle (1% CPU usage), so it takes 1 BIGMACS per second to keep the system and top running. Now, heat up the CPU too far and the BIOS slows down the CPU to make it run cooler. Now the CPU can only make 1 BIGMACS per second. It still takes 1 BIGMACS per second to keep the system and top running, so now top will show that the CPU is 0% idle (100% CPU usage). This is what I was suggesting. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org