>> there's no known practical attack on it. It performs well. So it is
>
>                 ^^^^^
>
> That's the word, of course...  Any government that discovers a successful
> attack is going to keep quiet.

Except in a certain side-channel sense -- any government that
discovers a successful attack on an encryption algorithm it regularly
uses will know that other parties could have discovered the same
attack, and will then need to limit its use of the compromised
algorithm.  That behavior change will be observed by other parties and
will prompt suspicion about a possible vulnerability.
Unless the party that discovered the vulnerability stepped up use of
the compromised algorithm, but only for unimportant data or
misinformation...

Oh, security headgames.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Ron Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/24/2009 02:36 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Anyway, the AES cipher is one that is very well studied. It has been
>> implemented all over. Just about anybody have tried to attack it and yet
>> there's no known practical attack on it. It performs well. So it is
>
>                 ^^^^^
>
> That's the word, of course...  Any government that discovers a successful
> attack is going to keep quiet.
>
>> a very sane choice as a block cipher.
>
> --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA  USA
>
> The feeling of disgust at seeing a human female in a Relationship
> with a chimp male is Homininphobia, and you should be ashamed of
> yourself.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject
> of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to