In <20090526142918.gc5...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: >On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:17:16PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> In <20090525163904.gb5...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: >> >On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> >> In <20090524145214.ga16...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote: >> >> >I >> >> >don't want to run an akonadi server either, whatever that is. >> >> Oh, then you don't want to run those parts of KDE; They require a >> >> connection to an Akonadi server. They've been scheduled to since >> >> before KDE 4.0 was available. >> >Maybe not. I'd be fine without them, if it would work without --- but >> >it doesn't. >> I said it before, and I'll say it again: That is just not true. I was >> careful in my package selection and I have a working KDE 4.2 (including >> my must-have kmail) and I do not have a mysql server installed. >> >> KDE 4.2 can work without Akonadi, with a minimum of fuss. >It is true, just a matter of fact.
No, it is not. Your statement: KDE 4.2 doesn't work without the parts that want an Akonadi server. Fact: I have a working installation of KDE 4.2 sans Akonadi. Therefore, your statement is untrue. A more correct statement would be: I can't get KDE 4.2 to work without Akonadi and no one can tell me how; there's at least one prat that has it working but he doesn't seem to know how to get from his configuration to mine. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
