On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote: > In <200906021043.59937....@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >>In <20090602133233.ga7...@blitz.hooton>, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: >>>I would argue that another bug is that its not statically >>>linked. >>We do have busybox-static which provides a statically-linked >> version of a lot of utilities -- enough to recover from most situations >> with enough effort. > > In particular, it has a statically-linked 'ed' and 'vi'. I do not understand why this issue is related with static linking or dynamic linking, now I'm wondering is it proper for me to add the link /bin/ed which points to /usr/bin/ed? if not proper, should I remove the link made by me? (I found that ed was upgrade again today, maybe to fix the bug) thanks! > -- > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. > b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) > ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' > http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/ > >
-- 不苦不樂正念正智 Gnu.Linux.(Debian|gNewSense).Gnome.(Mozilla|Gmail|Evolution|Scim|Flashplayer) Microsoft.Windows.(Vista|XP).(QQ|Game|Notepad++) Gcc.Gtkmm.Opengl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org