On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> was > heard to say: >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: >> > Downgrade the following packages: >> > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)] >> > >> > Score is 80 >> >> I wonder why aptitude is suggesting this, downgrading mktemp would not >> really help. > > According to packages.debian.org, mktemp version 1.6-4 doesn't have > the problematic dependency, probably because it's a real package and > not a transitional package.
Surely, but why does aptitude want to downgrade it to 1.5-9 then? Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
