On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:18:34 +0800 明覺 <shi.min...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not think so, every language is a set of hammer, plier and > screwdriver in my eyes, we just need one. Having used a lot of those, "Swiss Army Knife," kinds of tools I can tell you that they are absolute junk and will prefer a single-purpose tool every time. > I believe readers of this thread are all advanced programmers, they > won't be confusing. I am not any kind of programmer but certainly see the wisdom of those who have told you already that you are on a wrong path. See here: http://www.cprogramming.com/langs.html This page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language explains very well. Here's one quote: Although there have been attempts to design one "universal" computer language that serves all purposes, all of them have failed to be generally accepted as filling this role. On the whole, your take on all t his reminds me strongly of the .sig found below: Cybe R. Wizard -- Their address sums up their attitude: One Microsoft Way. Winduhs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
