thing, but there*'*s already Firefox _3.5_. (I hope they *fixed* the bug in that version)
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Soren Orel <soren.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Lastly, for the real question: why are you on Lenny? Institution mandate? > Narrow pipe? Fear of Testing breakage?" > What do you suggest? Is sid good for a Desktop environment? :O > I just want to upgrade e.g.: Iceweasel, because it has a bug, related to > adblock plus element hiding helper....it's just a "little" thing, but theres > already Firefox _3.5_. (I hope they the bug in that version) > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net>wrote: > >> On 2009-07-21 07:54, Soren Orel wrote: >> >>> Ok, I downloaded: >>> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/iceweasel >>> iceweasel_3.5.1-1_amd64.deb >>> Then: >>> dpkg -i iceweasel_3.5.1-1_amd64.deb >>> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> >>> So I must install a trillion dependencies from unstable, to get a normal >>> up-to-date browser under Lenny? >>> >> >> Yes. Running a mixed Lenny/experimental system is a recipe for disaster. >> >> I'd deinstall iceweasel and xulrunner, then install the FF binary directly >> from mozilla.org. >> >> Same with OOo3 (though I'd look first try www.go-oo.org), if you want the >> latest version. >> >> Lastly, for the real question: why are you on Lenny? Institution mandate? >> Narrow pipe? Fear of Testing breakage? >> >> -- >> Scooty Puff, Sr >> The Doom-Bringer >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a >> subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org >> >> >
