John Magolske wrote: > I've been trying to decide between dirvish & rdiff-backup. I read > something [1] arguing in favor of dirvish, citing it's advantage of > having images that are complete file systems. But dirvish does use > hard links, so the issue of such a backup not being exactly 1:1 gives > me some pause. I'm wondering if the archfs [2] you mentioned helps > address the "complete file system" issue. >
I've been a satisfied dirvish user for a couple of years now. I have two backup servers, one on site and one off site via an ssh tunnel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org