-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Siggy Brentrup wrote: > Yes, even if it means to back out X's dependency on the almost dead > HAL. I'm not yet fully decided, but I might even be inclined to help > him forking a more back to the roots Debian (without bash essential).
FWIW, removing bash from the list of essential packages (replacing it by dash) is one of the release goals for squeeze [1]. It might be more worthwhile for all of us, if you help debian to achieve the goal instead of yet another fork. ;-) Cheers, Johannes [1] http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkp1qNMACgkQC1NzPRl9qEUEGQCffuoswLhwMaxAsJmkvu7kgOKy Y18Ani3qwiyVEGfz/33sUxV/jYC0Otbp =FZe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org