On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:08:26 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I wrote:
>> It didn't say that the secret had been received, only that
>> debian-devel had been whitelisted. Nost likely, the user did so
>> manually.
> manoj writes:
>> And elected to recieve a message obviously spam and infected with a
>> virus?
> How would he have known that? He had not seen the message yet if I
> understand correctly. In any case, it seems more likely that he
> whitelisted the address manually than that the virus successfully
> returned the secret.
If I am going to whitelist addresses caught in my spam trap
manually, the least I would do is to grep the relevant messages out
of the spam trap and see if whitelisting is the thing to do.
Most likely, some reader of the mailing list sent in the
secret as pay back for the annoyance of these silly CR messages
that seem hell bent on spamming -devel (indeed, there was a
short discussion whether TMDA should be thrown out of Debian
since it seemed to so cluelessly spam the list)
manoj
--
"... And remember: if you don't like the news, go out and make some of
your own." "Scoop" Nisker, KFOG radio reporter Preposterous Words
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
