On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet <tchate...@free.fr> wrote: > On Wednesday 20 January 2010 14:44:20 Jeffrey Cao wrote: >> On 2010-01-20, Thierry Chatelet <tchate...@free.fr> wrote: >> > Ouppsss, sorry >> > >> >> And libtre5 is in squeeze, so you to wait for it to move to sdueeze >> > >> > I mean >> > And libtre5 is in "sid", so you to wait for it to move to squeeze >> > Thierry >> >> But I installed elinks one year ago without dependency problem. >> I did "update" and "upgrade" frequently without problem until now. >> Maybe something is broken with package dependency management recently. >> >> Jeffrey >> > > Looking at elinks on debian package list, I saw that it depends on libtre4 and > not on libtre5 as requested by aptitude. So, my guess would be that you should > report a bug against elinks, or maybe contact the maintainer. > Thierry > There's already a bug reported against elinks package. Bug number: #565999. But I'm still wondering what caused this dependency issue. Before this problem shew up, elinks depends on libtre4. libtre4 is installed and elinks works fine. I checked elinks with "aptitude show elinks", and it says it still depends on libtre4, not libtre5. I'm sure elinks has not been updated for a long time. So, what is changed to make elinks depends on libtre5?
Jeffrey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
