Neal writes: > to use Adobe software without paying for it is stealing . . . money . > .. . no?
No. It may be copyright infringement if you do so without Adobe's permission, but copyright infringement is not theft according to the US Federal Courts. > Is it the case that the flash support offered by Debian is "free" > (i.e., without charge) in the Stallman sense? The "Stallman" sense of "free" is not "without charge". Think free speech, not free beer. > Again, in the end, if you want flash support (no matter what), cool. > But can a "purist" accept such support and be a true linux user? What is a "true Linux user"? -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874okeqrho....@thumper.dhh.gt.org
