On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 00:43 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Mark Allums put forth on 5/3/2010 11:41 PM: > > On 5/3/2010 11:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> Mark Allums put forth on 5/3/2010 5:01 PM: > >> [snip]
> Correct in that one should get 4GB on a netbook due to 64bit binary size? > Or correct that 64bit binaries are (slightly) larger than 32bit binaries? > I'd agree with you on the latter but not on the former. Stating the case of > the former is spreading misinformation. I attempted to shoot it down. It > is simply not correct to recommend 4GB for the reason you stated. > > > Please do not try to insult. It is not really useful, and wastes time. > right tools for the job, I never ever thought about putting 64bit os on my netbook - it physically limited to 2G of memory > Apologies. It wasn't meant as an insult but as an exclamation point backing > incredulity. > > -- > Stan > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1273016523.20116.37.ca...@alex-mini.samad.com.au