On 5/14/2010 6:13 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Mark Allums,
Am 2010-05-14 07:39:47, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Flash may not be a priority, sense it performs two functions. One,
it acts as the standard web video player. Two, it tries to be a
standard web programming interface and SDK.
The former is becoming mooted by the advent of HTML5. The latter is
boring, since there are 1000s of other ways to write programs that
run in web browsers, e.g., Javascript. No one really wants Flash to
be the go-to standard for programming, even if it offers a few shiny
gewgaws. Don't you hate Flash-based sites? I know I do.
...and I hate websites using a 200 kByte JavaScript, sucking 500 MByte
of memory and consuming 100% CPU resources to implement the same
functionality as the Adobe Flash-Pluging.
Yes, I know a bunch of Websites claiming there are Flash-Free... Using
JavaScript for this purpose is the same crap as using Flash.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
I am not so much pro Javascript as I am anti-Flash. And I concede that
there is room for improvement.
In fact, that is what I advocate: Improving Javascript.
Also, note: Do not confuse Javascript with Java. Two entirely
different animals.
MAA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4beeb393.1020...@allums.com