>Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be >pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants >virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is >required to prop up KDE4.* these days.
Who says that you need virtuoso to run KDE4? If you don't need it, you don't install it. It's like installing debian with Oracle, and afterwards complain that Debian needs Oracle... sigh... Schelstraete Bart http://www.schelstraete.org b...@schelstraete.org -----Original message----- From: AG <computing.acco...@googlemail.com> Sent: Thu 20-05-2010 10:30 To: debian user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Subject: Nepomuk wants virtuoso soprano Hi all Although I am logging into Gnome DE on an up-to-date Squeeze system, I receive a message at login that declares Nepomuk requires virtuoso soprano to work. Having looked nepomuk up via Google, it seems like it is something from our KDE friends, but using apt-cache search I don't see anything called virtuoso soprano to draw down to satisfy nepomuk. My question is: how does one satisfy nepomuk and/ or is nepomuk even necessary? Also, is it just me or do other folk here also find that KDE seems to be pulling in loads of dependencies ... databases, nepomuk (which wants virtuoso soprano), etc. just to operate? Seems like a lot of overhead is required to prop up KDE4.* these days. Anyway, any suggestions re: the nepomuk issue? Cheers AG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bf4eed9.1010...@gmail.com
