2010/6/28 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de>: > On 2010-06-28 21:07 +0200, Tomasz Maluszycki wrote: > >> I would like to compile packages for my laptop by myself, and I'm >> tired of changing options in makefile by hand. Maybe is there way to >> add them by these configure scripts? If I remember correctly packages >> are built against i386 architecture, and for me it is waste of my CPU >> capabilities; >> >> for example: instead of ' -g -O ' I would like to have ' -O3 >> -std-gnu99 -m128bit-long-double -m64 -mssse3 -mfpmath=sse -march=core2 >> ' > > You don't want -m64 on i386. Why don't you switch to the amd64 > architecture, where you get at least some of these optimizations by default?
I'm using AMD64 ;P And i don't want some of these optimizations by default, I would like to have most of them > >> (for me -O3 is stable... I didn't had any problem with it) > > Depends on the program, I think. In general, -O3 produces bigger > binaries (than -O2) that may or may not run faster. Mozilla even > builds with -Os by default. > Yeah, but linkers and compilers have big workload, and they can profit from -O3 Mozilla(or Xulrunner?) could too use -O2 at least >> is there simple way to do this? > > With recent dpkg versions (1.15.7 and newer) have a look at > dpkg-buildflags(1). After looking it seems that I can't find way to use this, and I can't find any example file... > Sven Thanks for nice info :) -- darkestkhan ------------------------------------------ jid: darkestk...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinl1v1wai9nhbc-ywghhn08_e8co4vklkwlh...@mail.gmail.com
