On (11/09/03 18:31), David Palmer wrote: > On Thursday 11 September 2003 17:50, Clive Menzies wrote: > > Thought this may be of interest to the list - worth a read, if you > > haven't seen it: > > > > http://linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2003091001926OSCDCY > > > > Regards > > > > Clive > > > Hello Clive. > Yes it was a powerful answer, but now I believe two days old. > SCOs' latest shot across the bows is this one which was in the earlier post:- > http://www.pcpro.co.uk/?news/news_story.php?id=47107
Seems like more noise and no substance to me, as well as demonstrating a misunderstanding of what open source is all about. Rather like MS accusing the latest open source initiative by governments in Asia of being "anti-competitive" > > What concerns me are things like url addressing, and most of the other > protocols that define the internet, being linux, must stay within the public > domain., otherwise they own that too. > If they own your freedom they possess your independent individuality. > If you are interested in this situation, Ralph Glanz has it fairly well > covered over at Promote-Open Source. > http://promote_opensource.org/modules/news/ Couldn't open this link? Regards Clive -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
