On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Gilbert Sullivan <whirly...@comcast.net>wrote:

>  A very good point. I was going to mention that the restore discs provided
> by some vendors (via this method of creating them using a utility provided
> by the vendor) will let you perform a clean OS installation which omits some
> or all of the "extraneous" or third party software that comes with the
> factory image. That's a very nice feature since, otherwise, I'll just be
> buying another license and doing a clean installation without the cr*pola
> added by the OEM anyway.
>
> It also lets any subsequent owner of the system get a nice, clean Windows
> image (well, as nice and clean as they get) on the system.
>
> I don't use Windows on any personal systems these days, but it was surely
> nice to have the option of an installation without all of the weird stuff
> added by the computer maker because of all of those sweetheart deals with
> their business partners.


The last laptop I bought for a friend was a Toshiba some 5 years ago.  Their
recovery partition/backup utility included virtually all of the crapware -
even the trial version of Office 2003 - maybe things are different now.  I
suppose YMMV depending on vendor, etc., but for the OP I would definitely do
a full disk image with Clonezilla regardless of what choice he makes with
the built-in recovery options.  Then all he needs to do is change user name
possibly before selling if he restores from backup Clonezilla image, if that
day comes.

Just my $0.02, especially since the last Windows 7 disk image I made with
Clonezilla took 15 minutes, it seems like a good idea regardless if you ever
use it or not.

Reply via email to