On 2010-11-04 20:29 +0100, Rob Gom wrote: > Hi all, > do you think it's a bug in either libc or coreutils (sort)? > > $ cat test.csv > aph3,"APP","" > aph3_devel,"TXT","" > aph3,"MiB","" > > $ LC_ALL=C sort test.csv # expected > aph3,"APP","" > aph3,"MiB","" > aph3_devel,"TXT","" > > $ LC_ALL=pl_PL sort test.csv # why is that? > aph3,"APP","" > aph3_devel,"TXT","" > aph3,"MiB","" > > $ LC_ALL=pl_PL.UTF-8 sort test.csv # another unexpected output > aph3,"APP","" > aph3_devel,"TXT","" > aph3,"MiB","" > > Could anyone give me a hint? I know that this is LC_COLLATE related > (LC_ALL as shorter version), but don't know whether it is my fault or > upstream bug. > > I'd appreciate any comments.
This is covered by the coreutils FAQ: http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Sort-does-not-sort-in-normal-order_0021 Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lj58n8em....@turtle.gmx.de