On Monday 13 December 2010 20:11:19 Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:57:50 +0000, Lisi wrote: > > On Sunday 05 December 2010 15:32:17 Camaleón wrote: > >> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:14:12 +0000, Lisi wrote: > >> > On Sunday 07 November 2010 23:24:17 Camaleón wrote: > >> >> - What is the current status of Iceweasel in Lenny? - Are all the > >> >> recent bugs of Firefox -that can affect 3.0 branch- fixed/ > >> >> backported to Iceweasel 3.0.6? > >> >> - Does 3.0.6 versioning number follow the upstream numbering? > >> > > >> > I have Lenny, and Iceweasel 3.5.15. Any updating has been done by > >> > aptitude. > >> > >> Then you should have "backports" repository enabled ;-) > >> > > :-/ > > > > I was under the (mis?)apprehension that things were only installed from > > backports if I specifically asked for them, i.e. "-t lenny-backports" > > was added to aptitude, and were only updated if already installed. > > Iceweasel 3.5.x is only available for Lenny by means of the "backports" > repo so... could it be that you installed that way and then forgot it or > maybe you tweaked the backports repo pinning settings under your "/etc/ > apt/preferences" file? :-?
Yes, the possibility that my memory had failed me occurred to me after I had posted. Given the state of my memory these days, anything is possible. :-( I haven't altered the pinnings. I'm still not confident enough to do that. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201012140933.32459.lisi.re...@gmail.com