[ Sorry for the late reply ] Le jeudi 10 février 2011 02:55:36, Rob Owens a écrit : > > Did you have other configuration issues ? > > I didn't have any major issues, but I did have to manually merge several > config files. If I know I modified the config file previously, I keep > my existing config file. Then I merge my changes into the new config > file, and make that the "offical" config file.
That's the kind of situation I want to improve with my config-model project. In this case, the goal is to merge user configuration with new package data without requiring user interaction. I hoped to have more feedback in order to better target the packages that needed to be improved. Given the lack of response, I guess that I will target package that bother me most often during upgrades (like cups)... > I was questioned about some config files which I know I did not modify. > In that case, I accepted the new one blindly. This one is more weird as the config file was modified by something, most often a post-install script. IMHO, this should be considered as a bug. All the best Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201102162046.14187.domi.dum...@free.fr