On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:38:24 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2011 09:41:43 Camaleón wrote: >> Since a week (or so) ago, my ClamAV log is urging me to upgrade to the >> lastest stable version available -as always- but I see no update in >> volatile repo... is that expected to be done? :-? > > From what I understand, the clamav binaries are only updated in stable > (even in stable/volatile or stable-updates) when a new version is needed > in order to use the updated virus definitions, or for the normal stable > update criteria.
Uh? Is that true? I thought the whole volatile repo was also handling "oldstable" packages? :-? > However clamav (and more and more software) starts getting noisy as soon > as upstream provides a new version, for whatever reason. Even in A/V > software, not every upgrade is appropriate for stable. Well, I don't read all and each of the ClamAV new released changelogs to see what has been patched, but being an AV I'd expect a new version corrects some severe bugs and not just "cosmetic" errors. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.17.17.05...@gmail.com
