On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:37:16PM -0700, Mark wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Freeman <hew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Matt Harrison wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. > > > <b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote: > > > > On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote: > > > >> > > > >>Are we seriously going to argue about which version of Ubuntu is > > > >>supported for how long? > > > > > > > > I think it is reasonable to discuss, if a little OT. > > > > > > > >>Who cares? > > > > > > > > Someone that doesn't necessarily want to upgrade on Debian's schedule. > > With > > > > Ubuntu, you can get 5 years, as opposed to Debian's ~3 years. With > > SLE* you > > > > can get 10 years. I'm not sure about RHEL, but I think it is roughly a > > SLE* > > > > timeframe. > > > > With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server packages and what ones are desktop packages? I don't know. It would be nice to see a list somewhere.
-Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110406231712.gb7...@aurora.owens.net
