In <[email protected]>, Heddle Weaver wrote: >IBM have just come up with something that I think we could probably use. >I'll just supply the link here and then sit back and see who's going to take >a punt on clicking on it. > >*http://tinyurl.com/3dau4ly
From those that don't like these hidden links: http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Application-Development/IBM-Launches-Maqetta-HTML5- Tool-as-OpenSource-Answer-to-Flash-Silverlight-669762/ To the OP: Your message looked really a lot like SPAM. I almost reported it as such. I personally dislike the direction they've decided to go with HTML 5 at all levels: in the contents of the specification, banding and marketing, and development model. That said, I prefer HTML 5 to Flash and I think Maquetta will be neat to use if I ever need flashy features. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [email protected] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
