On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:

> On 04/23/2011 12:59 PM, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>> I'm also looking into creating a temporary mount point and deleting when 
>> it's done, but if there's a crash or something, that temporary mount point 
>> would remain, unless I put it in /tmp or something radical like that.
> 
> Couldn't you copy the file instead (possibly calling smbclient) to the 
> temporary directory?

Actually, that's a good point and it would be a lot better than putting a mount 
point in there.  I've just been so keen on the whole "don't put it on the 
client system" thing that I didn't think of that.

It looks like I'll have to be taking a multi-part approach, using one way for 
Windows and another for Linux and OS X.  And the few people that I deal with 
that have Linux on a desktop are more aware and don't freak at the idea of 
having more installed on their computer.  And, in my experience, OS X users 
aren't nearly as tough to deal with in situations like this, either.

(It really doesn't make sense -- but then fear often is irrational.  I've seen 
small business owners that freak at the idea of anyone touching their 
router/firewall to add a static IP address or any port forwarding because their 
cousin or brother or son fscked up the network when he said he knew what he was 
doing and they freak at the idea of a small service provider like me installing 
software on their computer, but then they browse unsafe porn sites and install 
something off the Internet (saying, "But it's on a professional looking 
website, so they must know what they're doing!") and they think there's no way 
they're doing anything dangerous.)



Hal

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/311b8b0d-0017-47db-8bbb-daaf7edb1...@halblog.com

Reply via email to