On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> wrote:
On 04/25/2011 02:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> Ron Johnson put forth on 4/25/2011 1:25 AM: >> >>> On 04/19/2011 05:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> [snip] >>> >>>> >>>> XFS beats EXT4 hands down in nearly every category, >>>> >>> >>> Including not being able to xfs_check very large filesystems on 32 bit >>> machines. (Which if why I'm going back to ext4.) >>> >> >> This is an odd statement given that XFS (on 32 bit archs) and EXT4 both >> currently top out at 16 TiB. Thus moving to EXT4 gains you nothing on a >> 32 bit machine, and you lose many advantages. >> >> Please define "very large filesystems" and post the specific error >> message you received when running xfs_check on this "very large >> filesystem" on your 32 bit machine. >> >> > The fs was approx 3.5TB. > > # xfs_check /dev/mapper/backup_vg-backup_lv > xfs_check: Out Of Memory Total amount of ram, top of top would be handy too.... -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
