Reposting to the list, OP, obey REPLY-TO headers or use 'Reply All'. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Jose Legido <j...@legido.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Chris Brennan <xa...@xaerolimit.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jose Legido <j...@legido.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello > >> I had windows with ntfs > >> I installed ubuntu. All ok. Gurb with 2 os, can ran windows and uvuntu > and > >> can mount windows partition in ubuntu > >> I installed debian with lvm over ubuntu partition. > >> I can't mount windows partition now, and windows doesn't appears in gurb > >> > >> # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/windows/ > >> mount: unknown filesystem type 'LVM2_member' > >> > >> # pvs --all > >> PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree > >> /dev/dm-1 -- 0 0 > >> /dev/dm-2 -- 0 0 > >> /dev/root -- 0 0 > >> /dev/sda1 lvm2 a- 113,25g 113,25g > >> /dev/sda2 -- 0 0 > >> /dev/sda5 vol64 lvm2 a- 113,25g 0 > >> > >> I can't active vg because haven't name, but is not lvm, is only ntfs > >> partition > >> Maybe ubuntu puts in lvm and grub? Any idea? I have a lot of usefull > >> information in > >> Thanks! > > > > What does 'vgscan' produce? > only shows the debian LVM > # vgscan > Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... > Found volume group "vol64" using metadata type lvm2 > > > > Was windows installed on it's own LVM? > > No. I don't know who created this LVM! > > > did you load the ntfs module (from the kernel) or did you try to use > ntfs3g? 'Ware > > the user though, NTFS write support with either module is flaky at best, > > some have reported success, some have not, YMMV. > > > > I use ntfs3g: > # mount -t ntfs /dev/sda1 /mnt/windows/ > NTFS signature is missing. > Failed to mount '/dev/sda1': invalid argument > The device '/dev/sda1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:45 PM, shawn wilson <ag4ve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > do an 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' and confirm everything, > > # fdisk -l /dev/sda > > Disk /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disk identifier: 0xfce09344 > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 * 1 14784 118752448+ 8e Linux LVM > /dev/sda2 29570 30401 6683040 12 Compaq diagnostics > /dev/sda3 14785 29569 118759425 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 14785 29569 118759424 8e Linux LVM > > Partition table entries are not in disk order > > > > but, 'mount -t ntfs > > .... ' should work for you. it is possible that sda on ubuntu is > > showing up as sdb in debian - why you should use labels if you don't. > > > > The same problem: > > # mount -t ntfs /dev/sda1 /mnt/windows/ > NTFS signature is missing. > Failed to mount '/dev/sda1': Argumento inválido > The device '/dev/sda1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > > > A lot of thanks! > post the output of the following commands mount df -h cat /proc/partitions lsmod | grep ntfs uname -a file /dev/sdxX (where 'x' is sda and sdb and 'X' is for each partition. -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
