On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:21 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf > <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > > >On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > >> If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda > >> make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it > >> does "force" people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc. > >> Reminds me to start migrating away from their products and start > >> treating them as Microsoft's. Guess i'll learn exim et al :) > >> </rant> > > > >Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace > >Google's search engine. > > > >E.g. > >http://www.ixquick.com/ > >and > >http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm > >can't replace Google for my needs. > > > >Btw. I talk homepages down that use trackers, such as Google analytics. > > > > > Google will stop supporting older browsers for their Google Apps > application, not their search engine. I am sure you will be able to > continue using any old browser you can find to use Google Search. > > Jeff > >
My reply was regarding to "reminds me to start migrating away from their products and start treating them as Microsoft's", regarding to Google's behaviour in general. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1307046477.1990.21.camel@debian