On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:35:53 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 10:51:34 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > >> I can understand that the package is provided with a monetary cost (but >> still open source). What I fail to see is why the author does not want >> it to be distributed by anyone :-? > > He has never said that. Quite the opposite:
Ein? > I repeat with precision "No. Do what you want". I promise I won't > complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not. > > And > > >> As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a > >> message in this bug report that "You can even make [this software] > >> a GPL software"[1], which I understand him to mean that the intent > >> of the new license is to be GPL-compatible! > > > > You are reading very selectively. > > Jeff is reading right. > > (The final sentence is Gilles Lamiral's). Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was removed): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60 Maybe he didn't express it in the right way (!?), but now I'm afraid his possition is not very clear... Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.21.17.10...@gmail.com