On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:54:23 -0300, D G Teed wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I'm still with lenny (now oldstable) but I was even told that not all >> security flaws reached votatile, just some, depending of the nature of >> the flaw... >> >> And again, if this policy has recently changed is more than very >> welcome, my clamav is also claiming for an update and oldstable is >> still supported. >> >> > If you are running oldstable, I don't know where you'll find a current > statement on what goes into volatile.
In that same announcement: "(...) Lenny's Volatile suite might still get updates on a case-by-case basis after the release of Squeeze as the next stable version." > It is really a different repo than squeeze-updates. AFAIK, it has only changed the name. > The statement for squeeze-updates repo purpose makes it very clear it > isn't for security: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile-announce/2011/msg00000.html > > Quote: > > * The update is urgent and not of a security nature. Security updates > will continue to be pushed through the security archive. The key point here is discerning if the update is "urgent" enough, and that's what I was referring to :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.06.28.13.31...@gmail.com