On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:32:19 +1000
Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.producti...@gmail.com> wrote:
I do exactly what you say, generally. I forgot to recomment the stupid line
last time I pulled in a multimedia package.
> Anyway - the problem is a little fiddly by easily fixed.
>
> If it was me I'd:-
> comment out anything that is not a "standard" squeeze repository in
or wheezy ?
> /etc/apt/sources.list
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get -sf install | more
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 42 not upgraded.
> then depending on the output of the last command:-
> # apt-get -s remove vlc | more
> if nothing core/critical is about to be removed:-
> # apt-get remove vlc
> you might get an "autoremove" message - if it showed nothing
> core/critical then:-
> # apt-get autoremove
> then:-
> # apt-get -s install vlc | more
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but 4:0.5.2-6 is to be installed or
libavcodec-extra-52 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but it is not installable
Recommends: vlc-plugin-notify (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be
installed
Recommends: vlc-plugin-pulse (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
So I think I'm back where I started.
So it's not possible that vlc on wheezy is busted ?
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110712073341.4a6c1...@windy.deldotd.com
