>>>>> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <edua...@kalinowski.com.br> writes:
>>>>> On Qui, 01 Set 2011, Tony van der Hoff wrote:

 >> This one didn't (here).

 >> Is there any concensus on what/how/when these footers are added? It
 >> seems quite random to me.

 > That message was GPG-signed, the footer is not added because it would
 > break the signature. (Actually, it was added to another part of the
 > multi-part message, but I could only see that by looking at the
 > message source.)

 > I believe HTML mails also do not get the footer (or something along
 > the same lines is done).

        Curiously enough, the message I'm replying to [1] didn't have
        the footer, either.  (I'm looking at it as raw text, so MIME
        doesn't matter.)

        However, its Content-Type: is:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes

        Which, I guess, is to be blamed for that, thanks to “DelSp=Yes”.
        Seemingly, the mailing list software only adds the footer for
        the single-part messages whose Content-Type: it recognizes.

[1] news:20110901150151.horde.x0w0jmm_qovox8ip2ktq...@mail.kalinowski.com.br

-- 
FSF associate member #7257      Coming soon: Software Freedom Day
http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/861uvzblq9....@gray.siamics.net

Reply via email to