On 22/12/11 20:55, Raf Czlonka wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:50:57AM GMT, Ashton Fagg wrote:
On 22/12/11 11:39, Sharon Kimble wrote:
As the drive is owned by root should it be run as sudo?
Yes, or as root (su -c 'chown blah blah').
What's the point of running "su" as root?
My wording wasn't clear, apparently. I didn't mean run "su" whilst as
root, I meant use "su" to run it as root as an alternative to sudo. Does
that make more sense? :)
Your example will only change user "blah" permissions for "blah"
file/directory. Example above is better as it changes the permissions
recursively and group ones as well.
By "chown blah blah" I actually meant "insert the command from the
previous reply". I thought that would be obvious...
Apparently my internet communication skills are way off today, apologies.
Cheers,
Ashton.
--
Ashton Fagg ([email protected])
Web: http://www.fagg.id.au/~ashton/
Keep calm and call Batman.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
