stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:43:06PM +0200, Werner Mahr wrote: >> >> Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2003 18:32 schrieben Sie: >> > > make-kpkg modules_image >> > >> > Shouldn't that create a .deb for the modules, that I need to dpkg >> > -i? If so, I can't seem to find it. >> >> Sorry, modules_image is only for 3. party modules in >> /usr/src/modules. Try make-kpkg modules and itz schould work. Try man >> make-kpkg and scroll many sites downwards, there are all targets >> described. >> > > Mmm, something still smells fishy hrere. When I do that, it complains about > not being able to build 12c. Now I had built 12c on a previous kernel, but > I don't want it on this one. It still seems to be buildign moules in > /usr/src/modules, rather than in the newly downloaded source tree. > > Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here?
I can't find context, but: -- make-kpkg modules-image looks for directories in /usr/src/modules, and tries to build a third-party module from each of them; -- make-kpkg modules does the same, but also GPG-signs the result; -- you don't need to do either if you've just selected modules in the kernel configuration, since those modules wind up in the normal kernel-image package. It sounds like what's going on is that, at some point, you installed i2c-source and unpacked /usr/src/i2c.tar.gz, and now 'make-kpkg modules-image' is going off and building that. That's the expected behavior. If you don't want i2c or anything else in /usr/src, you're probably done. (ObUnstable: if you're running unstable, and trying to build i2c modules, you really really don't want i2c enabled in the kernel, at all.) -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
