On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 05:40 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > I think he wanted to CC'd so ... > > ----- Forwarded message from Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> ----- > > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:28:15 +0200 > From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpope...@gmail.com> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: General unstability on wheezy (unstable repository) > > On Lu, 05 mar 12, 10:36:45, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > > > I'm speaking about "testing" not "unstable". It used to be quite stable > > and works well for the last 5 years. > > Now, it is unstable in the sense that there are many critical bugs that > > were introduced recently. > > For me such regressions should remain in "sid" and not go into > > "testing". > > Release critical bugs (RC) do stay in unstable, if they are found before > the package automatically migrates to testing. Do you have some specific > examples?
Currently, evolution is really a pain using. It craches every 20mn, on some systems it even won't start unless inside gdb otherwise segfault. I see more that 420 bugs with many as major. I agree these are not release critical but so many bugs is a big indicator. Also there are at least 2 bugs which are severity grave. UML is crashing even on aptitude, and many other issues like gnome3 loosing characters or X server dieing frequently or hanging when not. Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
