On 20120331_061146, Tom H wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Paul E Condon > <pecon...@mesanetworks.net> wrote: > > On 20120329_095413, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> On Mi, 28 mar 12, 16:58:03, Paul E Condon wrote: > > > >> > > You could have also considered uncompressing the tarball somewhere > >> > > else, > >> > > like $HOME/tmp or $HOME/src, but it sure is a valid solution, > >> > > especially > >> > ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ > >> > On my computer that is running wheezy neither of these suggestions work, > >> > because, I think, these are not mount points supporting access to > >> > external > >> > physical disk hardware. > >> > >> You must be misunderstanding me, I meant "some directory in your home", > >> because on most systems /home has enough space. > > > > No. You misunderstand me. There is a new extra requirement on TMPDIR, a > > restriction on ones choise of its value. A directory entry on a disk > > file system is not enough. It must be a directory entry that has a line > > in /etc/fstab that enables its use as a mount point to real separate > > partition. At least that is the way it is now. If this restriction were > > removed by some change in the implementation that I know not how to do... > > then your suggestion would likely work and the old way of using /tmp > > would also work. > > There's no extra requirement! > > If you set up "/tmp" as a "real separate partition", that's the "/tmp" > that the system'll use (it looks like it'll be a bind-mount over a > tmpfs "/tmp" if you don't set "RAMTMP=no" in "/etc/default/rcS"). > > Pre-tmp-as-tmpfs, if you don't set up "/tmp" as a "real separate > partition", "/tmp" is a directory on "/". > > Post-tmp-as-tmpfs, if you don't set up "/tmp" as a "real separate > partition", "/tmp" is a mount-point for a tmpfs filesystem the default > "RAMTMP=yes" set in "/etc/default/rcS". > > By default, the size of this filesystem is 20% of RAM because there > are other tmpfs filesystems set up by default ("/run", "/run/lock", > "/run/shm") and they've been sized, respectively, at 10% of RAM, 5MiB, > 20% of RAM so that the total of tmpfs filesystems adds up to > "50%+5MiB" for systems that don't have any swap set up to be able to > operate in the event that the tmpfs filesystems are used up fully. > > If you want a larger tmpfs "/tmp", you can change "TMP_SIZE" in > "/etc/default/tmpfs" (or, untested, edit "/etc/fstab" and add a "tmpfs > /tmp tmpfs size=xxx 0 0"). I'd mentioned earlier someone else's > suggestion that you can set the maximum size of to RAM+SWAP. It's > probably safer to set it to 20%_of_RAM+SWAP. > > If you don't want to use tmpfs for "/tmp", you simply set "RAMTMP=no" > in "/etc/default/rcS". > > > > I never had a dedicated partion for /tmp and now it is required. That, > > to me, is a change. I fixed it when I learned that it is now required, > > and I think it would be nice to go back to the old way because the old > > way did not require a separate partition. But I repeat myself. Enough. > > Having a tmpfs filesystem for "/tmp" doesn't mean that a dedicated > partition is required for "/tmp".
What you say doesn't work for me, but something else does. Peace. -- Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120331170839.gg3...@big.lan.gnu