On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:04:13 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > I am now asking this question for the third time, but now in separate > thread.
For the "third" time? Then is that I missed it. You did the right move by opening a new thread :-) > As this list seems to be against GPG INLINE signatures, Uh? First notice I have :-? I recognize it's annoying to delete the extra text when replying to PGP/ GPG inline messages but I can live with that. > I have promised to move to S/MIME (with devices which support it) when > someone on this list tells me how do I manually verify PGP/MIME > signature in case email client cannot be used to do it. You don't have to move on S/MIME if you don't want. > Example case would be verifying message from mailing list archives. I > will also move to PGP/MIME if anyone on this list admits my point that > it's easier to verify GPG INLINE manually than PGP/MIME. (...) Dude, use whatever you like most, if someone complaints that's up to them (unless there's some hidden rule/policy for this I'm not aware of) ;-) Anyway, openssl's smime should be able to verify the signature. As per the man page: *** The smime command handles S/MIME mail. It can encrypt, decrypt, sign and verify S/MIME messages. *** There are some usage samples at the bottom of the page. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jlv04f$ss9$1...@dough.gmane.org
