on Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:27:31PM -0500, Alan Shutko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:48, Alfredo Valles wrote: > > >> I was near suicide when some good guy in this list recommended me > >> spamassissin. It's so easy to get to work and once that you train the > >> bayesian filter bye bye to all the stupids swen mails. > > > > Yeah, that's one option. I considered it, but the problem is, if you > > feed the learner with tons of similar viruses, how good will it be to > > kill spam...? > > In my experience, still really, really good. I haven't been getting > any additional false possitives, and I haven't been missing any more > spam than normal. > > This is with bogofilter.
Dittos. I've created a "spam-learn" folder, over which "sa-learn --spam --dir" is run via cronjob every 30 minutes. False negatives get tossed there. Filtering is now *very* good. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Bush/Cheney '04: Over a billion Whoppers served.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
