-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 08.05.2012 15:38, Indulekha kirjoitti: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:05:30PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > 08.05.2012 15:03, Indulekha kirjoitti: >>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:00:16PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen >>>> wrote: 08.05.2012 14:57, Indulekha kirjoitti: >>>>>>> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0300, Mika >>>>>>> Suomalainen wrote: 08.05.2012 14:45, Jochen Spieker >>>>>>> kirjoitti: >>>>>>>>>> Indulekha: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, I think you may have an incorrect or >>>>>>>>>>> incomplete configuration.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is inline vs. MIME: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.phildev.net/pgp/pgp_clear_vs_mime.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> J. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And that page forgets the problems in MIME. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PGP/MIME requires headers, message and the >>>>>>> signature.asc to be verified. Some mailing list >>>>>>> programs mess up with the headers and this way make >>>>>>> PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In INLINE, the signature is in message and it doesn't >>>>>>> require headers to be verified so it's harder to be >>>>>>> messed up by mailing list software. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, all I know is that Jochen Spieker is able to use >>>>>>> it without being intrusive.... Maybe you should try to >>>>>>> follow his example? :) >>>> >>>> If I used PGP/MIME, my signatures couldn't be verified on >>>> Ubuntu mailing lists (I am on 5 of them if I recall >>>> correctly), nor Enigmail mailing list nor gnupg-user mailing >>>> lists nor many others. This is small list of those MLs, which >>>> I mean with http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/Clearsigning.html . >>>> >>>> >>>> I see... so the people on the *proper* msiling lists will >>>> just have to suffer then, eh? :\ >>>> > > I don't understand how those other mailing lists are inproper. > >> >> > > They don't support the considerate version of gpg/pgp. Now that I > know that people using this actually have a choice and choose to be > rude, it does make it rather tempting to set up an autoresponder > and filter to nag them...
Note that gnupg mailing lists are also affected and they aren't lists themselves, the problem is in mailing list software. I think that they all use GNU Mailman, which is very popular among mailing lists. People don't have a choice if they are on mailing lists, which force this by having this bug, but do as you want. - -- Mika Suomalainen gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 4DB53CFE82A46728 Key fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728 http://mkaysi.github.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPqRSCAAoJEE21PP6CpGcoBeAQAKQi1y2zJo6t54b3CrsZRtUn jj7aA3SDK7QHDKisQM4EScJLuiH6VFhbIr6ca2s8E99zjVx2Z26R400wfUDYqyJS VX1q4zceo8ttLbu9Qi0ai8G2o3FaAJn5zB6yz59n33sqxI9xCJwlDu8t/AYk76gP B57bII0P0GOvqvxzuTwAmOcYh/h6q0vZQlsHTlkIf94YFLAqSCg/uOYLKOyZF1Us PytI+PLFzuzFrXemHSSRZKWundjGC0rKry7IceHiWRAY+nDNMSnF7MNcWn+WhDep zvUv2YZ+zGAc2NDlBeusE97kmzZ8m3yNpeUpMoid6RoiFLGUEx0s6l1c6d0ghrH9 hPq5HWlnGgAPuKGmY5XrrMev/pVD6EOf8VKKejcYUprrXD4+jlnNCR9gX1npihdp 04hh3fgRWALpXp/qklISo5t032tgCKg1Jqr+DktSHquiXMUjnvO41L3KhNhwh74l 5SCY0R5F31mFvDT+rlLIJZG8baJ+5XmfGzPBkMOkkAvX25PORgJwhs6x5jVcoq/3 Wgd+gkIdi79ut/R/uZct8GyDHbBnLrLLM8KX3NvMuVW7ZctHoBR77D2tCTT34jto qDMJ/bd6Po6FYWAlKBL9DUKQHmHgzxRz7gKRgRnTf3lL2IxOFztJ9PzwjBiS1h5H GipAd3YeiJYqYdkgf61u =bH/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fa91484.6050...@hotmail.com