# [email protected] is CCed. Sorry to be late.
I would like to tell you the background of my last post. I was wondering why Free Software Definition was not sufficient for Debian Project. I thought this was permissive enough for the project. Once on twitter, I said that GNU's definition was more permissive than The Open Source Definition. But one of my followers replied that he did not think so. I could not understand what he meant, and I could not prove what I said. Then, I posted <[email protected]>. After reading your words, now I think The Free Software Definition is really permissive, but this very *permissiveness* made GNU's definition insufficient for Debian Project. Am I right? -- Hiroki Horiuchi from Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
