On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:36:30 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: >> >> > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the >> > eclipse version available in squeeze. So, I'd be happy with the >> > version from testing. >> >> (...) >> >> Have you considered in getting the upstream package instead¹? Being a >> java based application should be easy to install :-? >> >> ¹http://wiki.eclipse.org/FAQ_Where_do_I_get_and_install_Eclipse%3F >> >> > Yes, I'll do that as a fallback, but installing packages the manual way > looses all the advantages of the package management system.
That can be if you stick to the stable repo but using a testing package can even break not only you Eclipse installation (remember that testing packages update very often...) but badly messing up with system packages/ libraries because of dependencies. I mean, just be very cautius with the repository priorities when feeding from both sources. > Let's say that's an exercise to learn how to use apt along the way, > though I actually need the newer version. Sure! :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/js2898$5le$1...@dough.gmane.org
