On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:38 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:16:11PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 24 iul 12, 12:38:12, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > I'm confused, will Debian or will Debian not switch to systemd? > > > > Definitely not for wheezy, it's already frozen. As I understand from > > lurking on -devel, the plan is to demote sysvinit from Essential as soon > > as the wheezy+1 development cycle starts, to allow admins to experiment > > with systemd or upstart. > > Just to clarify, the removal of the Essential status from sysvinit > changes nothing--it's pointless and doesn't affect experimentation > with systemd or upstart, both of which can be used as a sysvinit > replacement right now. It will just make some of the dependencies > slightly cleaner, but is only a tiny detail.
I apologize again for my rant against http://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/e/ea/Interviews_LennartPoettering_Picture.jpg However, many people claim that pulseaudio is an advantage only. And now everybody claims that systemd is an advantage only. I experienced pulseaudio as a PITA for myself (pro-audio), but also as a showstopper when "averaged" people (= people who don't need pro-audio) try to switch from Windows to Linux. Is systemd ready yet? To get off the track: Not only Poettering's stuff is "experimental", also the switch from nv to nouveau IMO is insane. I decided to use Linux, because Linux in the past based on stable software. I wonder about the benefits to switch to unfinished stuff nowadays. Believing what I read at Arch-general mailing list, configuring systemd will be in some kind of irrational secret language. I'm sceptical, but to be fair, I never tested systemd myself. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1343277023.5783.40.camel@precise