Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 23:38 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:16:11PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Ma, 24 iul 12, 12:38:12, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > I'm confused, will Debian or will Debian not switch to systemd? > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely not for wheezy, it's already frozen. As I understand > > > from lurking on -devel, the plan is to demote sysvinit from > > > Essential as soon as the wheezy+1 development cycle starts, to > > > allow admins to experiment with systemd or upstart. > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, the removal of the Essential status from sysvinit > > changes nothing--it's pointless and doesn't affect experimentation > > with systemd or upstart, both of which can be used as a sysvinit > > replacement right now. It will just make some of the dependencies > > slightly cleaner, but is only a tiny detail. […] > I'm sceptical, but to be fair, I never tested systemd myself.
So what you are actually trying to say? Is there any real argument you have to make? I am not decided whether systemd is suitable for a replacement and I know technical arguments like its Linux only and I found some limitations myself like its init script compabitibility does not take care of further initscript arguments like for openvpn initscript to tell it which VPN to start due to not supporting something like this at its design level, but I do not see what trek and trivia add to the discussion. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207312105.31475.mar...@lichtvoll.de
